Blog Feeds
07-15 04:40 PM
Thanks to reader Adi for the link. Huffington Post reports on a data compiled by America's Voice showing crime in Arizona dropping dramatically across the state for most of the last decade EXCEPT for the area controlled by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio. Which goes to show you that facts matter very little to Arizonans buying into the antis arguments.
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/07/sheriff-joes-jurisdiction-only-area-where-crime-is-up-in-arizona.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/07/sheriff-joes-jurisdiction-only-area-where-crime-is-up-in-arizona.html)
wallpaper This is a diagram of Uranus#39;
gk_2000
04-06 04:30 PM
Hmm fresh new ID?
bombay_rail
06-19 12:06 AM
Friends,
In preparation to file I485, we just had medical tests and the doctor checked the box " Applicant does not meet immunization requirements" in my son's report citing the reason insufficient dates.
What is the impact of this ? How this can be remediated ? Any suggestions by those who experienced similar situation would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Bombay_Rail.
In preparation to file I485, we just had medical tests and the doctor checked the box " Applicant does not meet immunization requirements" in my son's report citing the reason insufficient dates.
What is the impact of this ? How this can be remediated ? Any suggestions by those who experienced similar situation would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Bombay_Rail.
2011 Planet uranus PSD
Cathy_P
February 9th, 2005, 05:56 PM
I like this, Freddy. There's always a warm feeling of life in an open air market. Where is this located?
more...
Blog Feeds
05-11 06:00 PM
The Dallas Morning News (http:// http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/news/localnews/stories/DN-smuggle_09met.ART.State.Edition2.4ccf3dd.html) reported that 27 people were arrested in the Dallas area on charges of migrant-smuggling. The Federal government has accused these people of bringing 500 to 1,000 illegal immigrants a month into the United States. The U.S. Attorney's office said these arrests were the result of a two-year investigation.
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/eOvRL5IEAIk/)
More... (http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Immigration-law-answers-blog/~3/eOvRL5IEAIk/)
alien02k
07-11 09:59 AM
First of all I am filing by postal mail USPS(not e-filing)
1)is it necessary to include I-765 receipt notice(EAD) with my AP application.. But I have only my last years one which will expire in a few months.
2) for AP renewal is it necessary to include marriage certificate for spouse
3) When filing by postal mail, and also considering i applied my I-485/I-140 before july 30/2007, old fee schedule... do i need to pay biometric fee for my AP renewal
4) I am in Texas and for mailing EAD and AP - can I send them together for me and my spouse. I see different PO Boxes for EAD and AP addresses for the Mesquite, TX address
IN I-765, is it enough only to specify the previous EAD information regarding the office filed and receipt date...or do i have to include my OPT EAD as well as my previous EAD filed last year.
Any clarification is highly appreciated
Thank you
1)is it necessary to include I-765 receipt notice(EAD) with my AP application.. But I have only my last years one which will expire in a few months.
2) for AP renewal is it necessary to include marriage certificate for spouse
3) When filing by postal mail, and also considering i applied my I-485/I-140 before july 30/2007, old fee schedule... do i need to pay biometric fee for my AP renewal
4) I am in Texas and for mailing EAD and AP - can I send them together for me and my spouse. I see different PO Boxes for EAD and AP addresses for the Mesquite, TX address
IN I-765, is it enough only to specify the previous EAD information regarding the office filed and receipt date...or do i have to include my OPT EAD as well as my previous EAD filed last year.
Any clarification is highly appreciated
Thank you
more...
hearthorbeguy
01-03 01:47 AM
Guys I will be going for my first H1 visa stamping in New Delhi. I am currently in the US. I transfered from F1 to H1. Have been looking into documents to take to the interview, and looking at so many 221(g) cases, have been confused by this term "unemployment wage report". I would really appreciate it very much if someone could please tell me what is "unemployment wage report" and how is different then "prevailing wage report"? Also, do I need to take both of them to the visa interview? Thanks!
Regards,
Hearthorbeguy
Regards,
Hearthorbeguy
2010 the planet Uranus.
yahoo1234
06-12 05:16 PM
Hi,
I am currently on STEM OPT and have lost my job. I have an offer from Company A but they are not willing to enroll into the eVerify system. To bypass this, they suggested that I take up employment with a consulting firm B (who is enrolled in eVerify) and then work on company A's project as a contractor through firm B. Would this be legally OK? I heard that even though I would be on company B's payroll, company A should still be registered with eVerify.
Can someone please advice on what is the legal requirement??
Thanks in Advance!
I am currently on STEM OPT and have lost my job. I have an offer from Company A but they are not willing to enroll into the eVerify system. To bypass this, they suggested that I take up employment with a consulting firm B (who is enrolled in eVerify) and then work on company A's project as a contractor through firm B. Would this be legally OK? I heard that even though I would be on company B's payroll, company A should still be registered with eVerify.
Can someone please advice on what is the legal requirement??
Thanks in Advance!
more...
Macaca
02-18 06:55 PM
Some paras from In Majority, Democrats Run Hill Much as GOP Did (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/17/AR2007021701352.html).
Democrats pledged to bring courtesy to the Capitol when they assumed control of Congress last month. But from the start, the new majority used its muscle to force through its agenda in the House and sideline Republicans.
And after an initial burst of lawmaking, the Democratic juggernaut has kept on rolling.
Of nine major bills passed by the House since the 110th Congress began, Republicans have been allowed to make amendments to just one, a measure directing federal research into additives to biofuels. In the arcane world of Capitol Hill, where the majority dictates which legislation comes before the House and which dies on a shelf, the ability to offer amendments from the floor is one of the minority's few tools.
Last week, the strong-arming continued during the most important debate the Congress has faced yet -- the discussion about the Iraq war. Democrats initially said they would allow Republicans to propose one alternative to the resolution denouncing a troop buildup but, days later, they thought better of it.
And yet, significant numbers of House Republicans have voted along with Democrats on the legislation passed so far -- a fact that somewhat mutes criticism about iron-fisted tactics.
In the first weeks of the new Congress, however, Democrats bypassed the usual legislative committees, refused to allow any amendments and took their agenda straight to the floor for passage. They said they needed a clear path to pass a handful of popular measures that were the basis of their successful November campaign, including expanded money for stem cell research, an increase in the federal minimum wage and implementation of recommendations of the Sept. 11 commission.
Democrats said they would impose "regular order," the rules that permit the minority to participate more widely, in short order.
But even after passing their domestic agenda, Democratic leaders have continued to marginalize Republicans, preventing them from having a voice in legislation such as a bill to withhold federal pensions from lawmakers convicted of ethics felonies and a $463 billion bill to fund the federal government for the rest of this fiscal year.
Last week's debate on the Iraq war, culminating in its passage Friday by a vote of 246 to 182, was conducted under a "closed rule," which means Republicans could not offer alternatives. "I understand what they did on their agenda," said Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho). "But to do a closed rule on something like this is a huge mistake. We're talking about war and peace. You don't play politics with war."
While they did not allow amendments on the Iraq debate, the Democrats gave every member of the chamber five minutes to speak on the resolution -- an unprecedented amount of debate on a nonbinding resolution, according to Thomas E. Mann, a scholar at Brookings Institution. He said that is more than the Republicans offered Democrats when the GOP passed a resolution last spring supporting the war in Iraq.
Democrats pledged to bring courtesy to the Capitol when they assumed control of Congress last month. But from the start, the new majority used its muscle to force through its agenda in the House and sideline Republicans.
And after an initial burst of lawmaking, the Democratic juggernaut has kept on rolling.
Of nine major bills passed by the House since the 110th Congress began, Republicans have been allowed to make amendments to just one, a measure directing federal research into additives to biofuels. In the arcane world of Capitol Hill, where the majority dictates which legislation comes before the House and which dies on a shelf, the ability to offer amendments from the floor is one of the minority's few tools.
Last week, the strong-arming continued during the most important debate the Congress has faced yet -- the discussion about the Iraq war. Democrats initially said they would allow Republicans to propose one alternative to the resolution denouncing a troop buildup but, days later, they thought better of it.
And yet, significant numbers of House Republicans have voted along with Democrats on the legislation passed so far -- a fact that somewhat mutes criticism about iron-fisted tactics.
In the first weeks of the new Congress, however, Democrats bypassed the usual legislative committees, refused to allow any amendments and took their agenda straight to the floor for passage. They said they needed a clear path to pass a handful of popular measures that were the basis of their successful November campaign, including expanded money for stem cell research, an increase in the federal minimum wage and implementation of recommendations of the Sept. 11 commission.
Democrats said they would impose "regular order," the rules that permit the minority to participate more widely, in short order.
But even after passing their domestic agenda, Democratic leaders have continued to marginalize Republicans, preventing them from having a voice in legislation such as a bill to withhold federal pensions from lawmakers convicted of ethics felonies and a $463 billion bill to fund the federal government for the rest of this fiscal year.
Last week's debate on the Iraq war, culminating in its passage Friday by a vote of 246 to 182, was conducted under a "closed rule," which means Republicans could not offer alternatives. "I understand what they did on their agenda," said Rep. Mike Simpson (R-Idaho). "But to do a closed rule on something like this is a huge mistake. We're talking about war and peace. You don't play politics with war."
While they did not allow amendments on the Iraq debate, the Democrats gave every member of the chamber five minutes to speak on the resolution -- an unprecedented amount of debate on a nonbinding resolution, according to Thomas E. Mann, a scholar at Brookings Institution. He said that is more than the Republicans offered Democrats when the GOP passed a resolution last spring supporting the war in Iraq.
hair Uranus is lying on its side in
sriha
05-15 11:01 AM
Hi,
My huband is working in H1B in USA? In most of the job boards they ask this question:
Are you legally authorized to work in the country in which you are applying?
what should i specify yes or no? Can somebody explain? Please it is urgent?
With Regards
Sriha
My huband is working in H1B in USA? In most of the job boards they ask this question:
Are you legally authorized to work in the country in which you are applying?
what should i specify yes or no? Can somebody explain? Please it is urgent?
With Regards
Sriha
more...
Blog Feeds
10-23 09:20 AM
A study done last year by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service ("USCIS") found as many as one-in-five H-1B applications were affected by either fraud or "technical violations," of the H-1B program. This may be the impetus behind USCIS� increased anti-fraud enforcement efforts. Whatever the reason behind such stepped-up efforts, there is no doubt that the USCIS has begun making more and more "surprise visits" to the U.S. work sites of companies that sponsor H-1B visa holders. The Office of Fraud Detection and National Security ("FDNS"), a division housed within USCIS National Security and Records Verification Directorate, was created in...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2009/08/h1b-fraud-fee-money-well-spent-.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/h1bvisablog/2009/08/h1b-fraud-fee-money-well-spent-.html)
hot Uranus and Neptune
eastindia
04-21 11:20 AM
Can someone ask their lawyers?
more...
house Uranus Planet
moonbus
04-29 10:58 AM
My situation is: last entry to US with F1 visa as a student. After graduated, got H1 visa, but didn�t leave US during the period.
When filling I485, need to answer the following questions.
1. In what status did you last enter?
For my case, should I fill �F1� here.
2. Nonimmigrant Visa Number, Consulate where visa was issued and issue date?
Does this refer to my H1 visa number? If so, since it is not issued by consulate, how I can answer the last two questions?
Thank you veyr much.
When filling I485, need to answer the following questions.
1. In what status did you last enter?
For my case, should I fill �F1� here.
2. Nonimmigrant Visa Number, Consulate where visa was issued and issue date?
Does this refer to my H1 visa number? If so, since it is not issued by consulate, how I can answer the last two questions?
Thank you veyr much.
tattoo Voyager Uranus
bhartigorkar
07-26 11:45 AM
I am not the art student.Just using online resources i was trying to build my skills.May be this is reflecting in my work now.So i have decided to quit from this competition.I am taking back all of my entries.
Thanks
Bharti
Thanks
Bharti
more...
pictures The temperature of uranus is
anand_bbb
04-13 08:47 AM
Hi
I am on H1B visa and married to a mexican citizen for past 2 years. we both have been living in mexico for past 2 years ( i am working as an Expat). 4 years ago my wife was in US on a Tourist visa and attended community school to learn English. she left the country in 6 months but while re-entering she mentioned her going to school to the agent upon which they processed a expedited removal and put a 5 year ban. She will complete her 5 years in Feb 2012. We are going to have a baby soon and would like to move to US next year after her 5 years are complete. i want to apply for a H4 visa for my wife and my baby. Will her expedited removal cause a problem with H4 application? thanks in advance.
I am on H1B visa and married to a mexican citizen for past 2 years. we both have been living in mexico for past 2 years ( i am working as an Expat). 4 years ago my wife was in US on a Tourist visa and attended community school to learn English. she left the country in 6 months but while re-entering she mentioned her going to school to the agent upon which they processed a expedited removal and put a 5 year ban. She will complete her 5 years in Feb 2012. We are going to have a baby soon and would like to move to US next year after her 5 years are complete. i want to apply for a H4 visa for my wife and my baby. Will her expedited removal cause a problem with H4 application? thanks in advance.
dresses Download Free Uranus 3D Space
luncheSpecials
02-19 05:09 PM
I filed 485 last july and want to file EAD now. I had FP done last year. If I do efiling for EAD will I have to go to ASC for photos. I saw in other posts that they have linked Biometrics but what abt the photos ?
Thanks
Thanks
more...
makeup Your chart as I had discussed
Openarms
07-11 04:27 PM
The big question is that why the so called "IV leadership" is not filling a FOIA request for how many EB3-I cases pending till date. Infact they should ask numbers for all the categories and their priority dates. It should be simple SQL query for USCIS.
This is such a burning issue and so many people are suffering from it. I still don't get it why would IV is not raising this issue... Can some one from leadership group respond please.......
This is such a burning issue and so many people are suffering from it. I still don't get it why would IV is not raising this issue... Can some one from leadership group respond please.......
girlfriend Uranus
vivekv
09-22 02:41 PM
Hi All,
USCIS has mailed my wife two different EADs upon renewal. The first EAD sent to us has a 2yr validity. About a couple of weeks later, she got another one, this time with a 1yr validity.
I spoke with my attorneys and they seem to indicate that the one with the 2yr validity should be the valid document of reference from here on.
My questions are,
1) have any of you experienced this kind of a goof up before?
2) do I just take my lawyer's word for it and ignore one of them?
Please advise...
:confused:
USCIS has mailed my wife two different EADs upon renewal. The first EAD sent to us has a 2yr validity. About a couple of weeks later, she got another one, this time with a 1yr validity.
I spoke with my attorneys and they seem to indicate that the one with the 2yr validity should be the valid document of reference from here on.
My questions are,
1) have any of you experienced this kind of a goof up before?
2) do I just take my lawyer's word for it and ignore one of them?
Please advise...
:confused:
hairstyles Uranus
setpit_gc
04-09 02:14 PM
TSC has cleared my EAD in 10 days. Applied on 27th of March 2009 and got 'Card Production Ordered' message on 9th of April 2009
waitingmygc
09-23 06:58 PM
Simple, by mistake they put China EB3 dates here.
rdehar
07-16 02:46 PM
Thanks sachug22.
I don't know when EB3 is going to be current for me, this gives something to weigh my options against.
I don't know when EB3 is going to be current for me, this gives something to weigh my options against.
No comments:
Post a Comment